That allows you to focus on getting data in and out of your cluster instead of sinking time into doing devops. I always recommend using it in hosted form and not running your own cluster.
#Apache lucene vs elasticsearch Offline
Ping me offline if you have additional questions - spent almost 20 years in the space and ran a search company of my own.Įlasticsearch, definitely. Especially with AI/ML technologies available around Document Understanding - the Enterprise market is open for a good on-prem upstart to really take off. This is an area I think is open to more competition. Algolia is doing great in the commodity online search space and seems to be growing well. Coveo plays in the Enterprise space, but it's a hard market. There's a number of interesting independent players still. Next, follow the path of online acquisitions:
* Google - GSA (now Google Cloud Search, hosted solution) * Autonomy - bought by HP (Look at the backstory on this deal!) * Fast - bought by Microsoft (Also known as the Enron of Norway.) Lucene is the core engine behind both of these solutions.įor fun, lets look at the large Enterprise acquisitions over the years: It scales well and there is good documentation and support.
Drawbacks are managing indexing - SOLR cloud is much harder to manage.įor commodity search workloads (general retrieval/faceting) Elastic does a fine job. There's a lot more customization available for relevancy/ranking OOB than Elastic. For retail/catalog search SOLR dominates.
0 kommentar(er)
